CritPt is a public benchmark of research-level physics challenges, built to test whether frontier AI models can carry out genuine physics research reasoning rather than textbook problem solving. The benchmark paper is arXiv:2509.26574 and we recommend reading it before applying. It will tell you quickly whether this work interests you.
We are engaging physicists to work on research-level physics problems in their own subfield. Depending on where your publication record fits, that can mean creating problems, solving them, reviewing completed work, or auditing it. We agree the specific assignment with you once you are matched to an area.
This is research-grade work rather than volume work. Whatever you produce has to be complete enough for another specialist in your subfield to follow and verify independently, so written reasoning is part of every assignment.
Five areas. We match narrowly: you need to have published on one of these specific phenomena, not in statistical physics broadly. Each area lists the methods it requires.
You should be able to point to your own papers demonstrating at least one of the following families:
A PhD in statistical physics, mathematical physics or a closely related field. This is a hard requirement. Postdoctoral researchers, research scientists and junior faculty are the strongest fit. Senior PhD students with a strong first-author record are welcome to apply.
Published work on the specific phenomenon above, not the adjacent one. This is the single most common reason we decline otherwise excellent physicists. Command of the methods is not enough if you have not published on the phenomenon itself.
A verifiable publication record. Three to five representative papers with arXiv IDs or DOIs, ideally from the last five years. First author strongly preferred. Every paper you list will be checked against the public record.
Working proficiency with LaTeX, Python, SymPy and Jupyter. Some familiarity with an agentic coding extension in VS Code is useful. Gaps here are acceptable if you declare them honestly.
English at B2 or above, including written reasoning. A large part of the value you add is how clearly you set out your argument.
10 hours per week, sustained across an 8 to 10 week window, starting immediately. Remote and asynchronous with no fixed hours.
$80 to $110 per hour, set by depth of subdomain match.
We consider all qualified applicants without regard to legally protected characteristics and provide reasonable accommodations upon request.
Mercor partners with leading AI labs and enterprises to train frontier models using human expertise. You will work on projects that focus on training and enhancing AI systems. You will be paid competitively, collaborate with leading researchers, and help shape the next generation of AI systems in your area of expertise.
Share the referral link below, and earn up to $440 for each successful referral through this unique link. Referral limits apply. See the Referral Policy for current limits. Don't know who to refer? Find relevant LinkedIn connections here. One interview, real results AI experts share how Mercor made hiring faster, fairer, and easier — with just one interview.
Posted 20 hours ago
Tagged as: Physics
Application Users – Inventor Professional on Windows – STEM $45-$55 per hour Hourly contract Remote Early applicant Posted by Mercor...
ApplyApplication Users – AutoCAD Mechanical on Windows – STEM $45-$55 per hour Hourly contract Remote Early applicant Overview We're looking...
ApplyBilingual Danish STEM Expert (PhD) — AI Safety $61-$65 per hour Part-time position Remote — Western Europe preferred Early applicant...
ApplyBilingual Norwegian STEM Expert (PhD) — AI Safety $77-$81 per hour Part-time position Remote — Norway preferred New opportunity Early...
ApplyNuclear Engineering & Safeguards Experts for Red Team $65-$75 / task Contract Remote F A P 10 hired this month...
ApplyApplication Users – Origin on Windows – STEM $45-$55 per hour Hourly contract Remote New opportunity Early applicant Posted by...
ApplyPlease visit work.mercor.com.
Don't forget to mention that you found the position on jobRxiv!
